Wednesday, December 2, 2015

Isn't Martial Law the end game?

As we live, wait, survive from one economic bubble to the next, isn't martial law the end game? Why did Halliburton / KBR build all those FEMA Jails? Those are privatised jails with investors sitting brand new and empty yet no crying from the investors?

Do you really think the outrageous police brutality is just a passing fancy?

 Our media keeps us focused on some camel jockeys attacking Paris which by the way, "Parisians can't stand Americans especially Black ones" to the greater extent.

 Mr. Carson, I'll give you credit for your statement and that's where that ends. Trying to gain young Black votes by "so called" stabbing the invisible man in the belt buckle. Team up with "Vanilla Ice" and cruise Beverly Hills in a drop top 64'.

 In any event, this post is about you "Slick Willy", you can't play a playa......playa!
                                                                   

SAN ANTONIO, November 19, 2015  — Dr. Ben Carson, a black neurosurgeon and 2016 Republican presidential candidate, has repeatedly stated that he believes there is a chance that the 2016 elections may not be held at all.
Widespread anarchy gripping the country could be reason enough for the Obama administration to announce the implementation of martial law and the suspension of some, if not all, of Americans’ constitutionally protected rights — including the right to vote and hold national elections.
On the surface this seems unbelievable, but upon further analysis, Carson’s ominous suggestion is plausible; this is an extremely unnerving scenario that all Americans should be aware of and ready for.
The Obama administration has very quietly and subtly done many inexplicable things that could very well be precursors to the suspension of some, if not all, of Americans’ constitutionally protected civil rights.
Carson went on liberal radio host Alan Colmes’ radio show and the discussion eventually came to whether or not Dr. Carson plans to run for president in 2016. He said that there may not even be elections in 2016; when pressed to explain further, Carson said,
“If in fact we continue to have all these decrees being made the way they’re being made, if in fact we don’t fight the kind of war that needs to be fought in order to really put an end to the threat that is brought on by ISIS, if we continue along a pathway of financial irresponsibility, if we continue along a path of envy, greed, and hatred — what happened with Occupy Wall Street will be a cakewalk compared to what will begin to happen in this country.”
When Colmes pushed Carson further on the possibility of cancelled or postponed elections, Carson responded, “I don’t want to find out, I really don’t want to find out. I don’t want to continue down this pathway that we are going down. This pathway where everything is framed in a political sense and our representatives are not working for the people, they’re working for their party.”
Martial law is “a system of complete control by a country’s military over all activities, including civilian, in a theoretical or actual war zone, or during a period of emergency caused by a disaster such as an earthquake or flood, with the military commander having dictatorial powers … In many foreign countries martial law has become a method to establish and maintain dictatorships either by military leaders or politicians backed by the military.”
In America, martial law must be called for by the President, who would then suspend most, if not all, of our constitutional rights, and only the President would be able to reinstitute our constitutional structure and declare an end to martial law.
If anyone believes this idea is far fetched, please consider the numerous emergencies that Obama has put America in position to experience in the next two years — possibly with more than one of these issues occurring simultaneously: the Ebola virus and its associated mandatory quarantine may continue to spread due to Obama’s pitiful prophylactic and responsive actions; our $18 trillion and counting government debt could finally cause the government spending bubble — the only thing propping up our economy — to pop, leading to all government spending halting overnight and the massive associated riots that would occur due to welfare, EBT and Medicaid/Medicare cards ceasing to work; and, the threat of Islamic terrorism and specifically ISIS, whose unmatched funding, training and brutality could fulfill their leaders’ promise to shed the blood of millions of Americans.
Additionally, Obama’s choice not to sufficiently secure the border must be taken into consideration with all of these possible emergencies, as open access to our country could only increase the liklihood of all three possible emergencies.
Never in the history of our country have we faced so many destructive threats at the same time. America has also never had leadership that has failed to competently handle every single threat facing our country. If Obama isn’t one of the most inept people to ever hold elected office, then his actions must be calculated to produce these results.
Obama knows he is unpopular with the military, therefore, he has had to find a different way to institute martial law — and that is through a “civilian national security force.” On July 2, 2008 at a campaign stop, Obama made the following unscripted statement: “We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”
In 2013 the United States spent $663.8 billion on the military, with personnel include 2.2 million people on active duty or in the reserves. America has local police forces, which could call in the National Guard, which could then call in the Department of Defense to protect the country in times of civil unrest. For what purpose, then, would a civilian security force funded with hundreds of billions of dollars and made up of millions of Americans be necessary?
Another worrying issue is that Obama has militarized almost every federal agency. In September of 2013, 70 federal agents in full body armor, carrying M-16s raided one person’s gold mining operation in a tiny Alaska town. They were from the Environmental Protection Agency looking for violations of the Clean Air Act. 
After this incident it was found that Obama had created law enforcement branches in over 70 federal agencies. It is estimated that there are over 120,000 law enforcement agents in the federal government who are not part of traditional law enforcement branches — CIA, FBI, DEA, ATF, DHS, DOJ, and Treasury Dept.
These law enforcement branches Obama has created are not comprised of just one or two security guards. Obama has armed these agencies to the teeth. Maj. General Jerry Curry, a 40 year, decorated, military veteran, wrote an op-ed for The Daily Caller pointing out how, in addition to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrations’ purchase of 46,000 hollow point bullets, the Social Security Administration (SSA) bought 174,000 hollow point bullets.
In reaction to these purchases, Maj. Gen. Curry said, “Hollow point bullets are so lethal that the Geneva Convention does not allow their use on the battlefield in time of war. Hollow point bullets don’t just stop or hurt people, they penetrate the body, spread out, fragment and cause maximum damage to the body’s organs. Death often follows. Potentially each hollow nose bullet represents a dead American. If so, why would the U.S. government want the SSA to kill 174,000 of our citizens, even during a time of civil unrest? Or is the purpose to kill 174,000 of the nation’s military and replace them with Department of Homeland Security (DHS) special security forces, forces loyal to the Administration, not to the Constitution?”
Curry goes on, “In the war in Iraq, our military forces expended approximately 70 million rounds per year. In March (of 2012) DHS ordered 750 million rounds of hollow point ammunition. It then turned around and ordered an additional 750 million rounds of miscellaneous bullets including some that are capable of penetrating walls. This is enough ammunition to empty five rounds into the body of every living American citizen.”
Curry’s final point is something that every American should consider: “Obama is a deadly serious, persistent man. Once he focuses on an object, he pursues it to the end. What is his focus here? … I hope I’m wrong, but something smells rotten. And If the Congress isn’t going to do its duty and investigate this matter fully, the military will have to protect the Constitution, the nation, and our citizens.”
Let’s pray that none of these matters fully materialize and Dr. Carson’s ominous suggestion becomes nothing but an afterthought. However, those who understand Obama know not to put anything beyond his desire to, in Obama’s own words, “fundamentally transform America.”
These next two years are his last chance.

Read more at http://www.commdiginews.com/politics-2/ben-carson-might-obama-cancel-the-2016-election-28523/#WYxwAHAvFGRpo8TH.99



You’ve heard all the hype. We’ve heard all the stories and videos about Jade Helm, FEMA Camps, and Martial Law… and people said we were “Conspiracy Theorists.” Even the Mainstream Media Has Covered Obama’s Plans For Martial Law, but still people looked the other way. 
I’ve covered, FEMA Concentration Camps Disguised As Shopping Malls Being Built Everywhere, and people looked the other way. Military and U.S. Agents Have Been Caught Patrolling Texas Streets Asking Mysterious Questions, and as shocking as it is, on more than one occasion, Texas’ Governor Mobilized State Militia’s To Protect Against the Feds, but still, people looked away. I’ve covered the sick and twisted relationship going on with Jade Helm, the Bilderberg’s, the CIA, and the sicking merging of Jade Helm With the Pentagon’s Biological Technology Office, but still, people looked away.
WHAT DO PEOPLE THINK ALL THIS IS?
In the video below you’ll get a rude awaking into what to expect from Martial Law… and Obama just signed it into law. A source also recently spotted thousands of Martial Law signs… more to come on that when the proof comes if the source can provide a picture for it. For now, check out the video, then learn what Obama has done right below.
Read & see more at > http://tinyurl.com/oq6rjut

Parting note:

I love liars, Bilderbergs, corrupt governments, acts of war, politicians, etc. because I create contingency plans.
Furthermore, I sit in the audience picking apart your performance. I'm not laughing with you, I'm laughing at you.

Fact checkers: NH-1, ground floor, there's a comm closet to the left if you keep straight into the main hallway.



at

When the US went bankrupt.



The Federal Reserve is bankrupt for all intents and purposes. The same goes for the Bank of England!
This article will focus largely on the Fed, because the Fed is the “financial land-mine”. 
How long can someone who has stepped on a landmine, remain standing – hours, days? Eventually, when he is exhausted and his legs give way, the mine will just explode!
The shadow banking system has not only stepped on the land-mine, it is carrying such a heavy load (trillions of toxic wastes) that sooner or later it will tilt, give way and trigger off the land-mine![1] 
Even if the call was genuine, it is too late. The land-mine has been triggered and the explosion cannot be averted under any circumstances. 
The only issue is the extent of the damage to the global economy and how long it will take for the world to recover from this fiasco – a financial madness that has no precedent. The great depression is “Mary Poppins” in comparison!
The idea of a central bank going bankrupt is not that outlandish. I am by no means the first author who has given this stark warning. What underlies this crisis (which I initially examined in an article in December 2006) is the potential collapse of the global banking system, specifically the Shadow Money-Lenders.
Nouriel Roubini, the New York University professor said [2]:


“The process of socialising the private losses from this crisis has moved many of the liabilities of the private sector onto the books of the sovereign. At some point a sovereign bank may crack, in which case, the ability of the government to credibly commit to act as a backstop for the financial system – including deposit guarantees – could come unglued.”

 Read more >  http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-federal-reserve-is-bankrupt/12648



Congress and the White House are engaging in another familiar ritual: The brawl over the federal borrowing limit, known as the debt ceiling. Here’s a look at some of the most frequently asked questions, and answers.
What is the debt ceiling?
The debt ceiling limits the amount of debt that the U.S. Treasury can issue.
Before World War I, Congress approved borrowing for specific purposes, but over the next two decades, it granted more flexibility to the Treasury to issue bonds without individual, definite authorizations. By 1939, Congress effectively established an aggregate debt limit that delegated to Treasury the ability to borrow up to a certain ceiling.
Why is the debt limit in the news again?
Last year, Congress voted to suspend the debt limit through March 15, after which the prior limit of $17.2 trillion would be reset to include any new borrowing. On March 16, the limit was reset at $18.1 trillion. Since then, the Treasury has been using extraordinary measures, such as the suspension of certain pension investments, to conserve cash.
On Thursday, Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew told Congress that it would exhaust those emergency measures by Nov. 3. After that, it will fund the government only with daily cash flow if the debt limit isn’t increased. Analysts at the Bipartisan Policy Center, a Washington think-tank, estimate that the Treasury would run out of cash between Nov. 10 and Nov 19.


 In Why Do Foreigners Invest in the United States? (NBER Working Paper No. 13908), Kristin Forbes notes that foreigners have earned substantially lower returns on their U.S. investments over the past five years than U.S. investors have earned abroad, even after removing the effects of exchange rate movements and government investments. This return differential exists even within individual asset classes (equities, foreign direct investment, and to a lesser extent, bonds) and after making rough adjustments for risk.
Still, foreign investors might choose to continue investing in the United States and financing the large U.S. current account deficit for several reasons. Indeed, they may choose to purchase U.S. portfolio investments in order to benefit from the highly developed, liquid, and efficient U.S. financial markets, and from the strong corporate governance and institutions in the United States -- although both of these perceived strengths of the United States have shown some vulnerabilities during the recent financial market turmoil. Foreigners also may invest in the United States in order to diversify risk, especially if returns in U.S. financial markets have little correlation with returns in their own country's domestic financial markets. Or, investors outside the United States may put their money here because of their strong linkages with the United States, through trade flows or such measures of "closeness" as distance, inexpensive communications, or sharing a common language.
Forbes asks which of these factors are actually significant in determining foreign investment in the United States. She finds that a country's financial development is consistently an important factor that affects its investment in both U.S. equity and debt markets. Specifically, countries with less developed financial markets invest a larger share of their portfolios in the United States and the magnitude of this effect decreases with income per capita. Her estimates suggest that if China's bond market were as well developed as the cross-country average - about the level of development in South Korea ---then China's predicted holdings of U.S. bonds would be about $200 billion below their current level.
Countries with fewer controls on capital flows and larger trade flows with the United States also invest more in U.S. equity and debt markets. And, return differentials are important in predicting U.S. equity (but not bond) investments, because foreigners invest more in U.S. equities if they have had relatively lower returns in their own equity markets. Finally, despite strong theoretical support, it appears that diversification motives have little impact on patterns of foreign investment in the United States.
Forbes notes that these results -- and especially the primary role of a country's financial market development in determining its investment in the United States -- have three important implications. First, the results support the theoretical literature on global imbalances that emphasizes the role of U.S. financial markets. Although the exact mechanism varies across models, one key theme in recent research is that lower levels of financial market development in other countries will continue to support capital flows into the United States, thereby supporting the U.S. current account deficit and large global imbalances without major changes in asset prices. A second, related, implication is that as countries around the world continue to develop and strengthen their own financial markets, this will gradually reduce this important driver of capital flows into United States. These adjustments would likely occur slowly, though, because the development of financial markets, especially in low-income countries, is a long process. Finally, and potentially more worrisome, because the liquid and efficient financial markets of the United States are a major impetus behind U.S. capital inflows, anything that undermines the perceived advantages of U.S. equity and bond markets could present a serious risk to the sustainability of U.S. capital inflows. The U.S. sub-prime crisis and continued turmoil in U.S. financial markets already may have undermined this perceived "gold standard" of financial markets, and the risk of a sudden increase in poorly thought-out regulation may aggravate these concerns. If countries with less developed financial markets begin to question the relative advantages of U.S. financial markets, this could lead to a more rapid adjustment in U.S. capital inflows, global imbalances, and asset prices.
-- Les Picker
The Digest is not copyrighted and may be reproduced freely with appropriate attribution of source.


The U.S. Has REPEATEDLY Defaulted

Some people argue that countries can’t default.  But that’s false.
It is widely stated that the U.S. government has never defaulted.  However, that is also a myth.
Catherine Rampbell reports in the New York Times:
The United States has actually defaulted on its debt obligations before.
The first time was in 1790, the only episode Professor Reinhart unearthed in which the United States defaulted on its external debt obligations. It also defaulted on its domestic debt obligations then, too.
Then in 1933, in the midst of the Great Depression, the United States had another domestic debt defaultrelated to the repayment of gold-based obligations.
(Update.)
Donald Marron points out at Forbes:
The United States defaulted on some Treasury bills in 1979 (ht: Jason Zweig). And it paid a steep price for stiffing bondholders.
Terry Zivney and Richard Marcus describe the default in The Financial Review…:
Investors in T-bills maturing April 26, 1979 were told that the U.S. Treasury could not make its payments on maturing securities to individual investors. The Treasury was also late in redeeming T-bills which become due on May 3 and May 10, 1979. The Treasury blamed this delay on an unprecedented volume of participation by small investors, on failure of Congress to act in a timely fashion on the debt ceiling legislation in April, and on an unanticipated failure of word processing equipment used to prepare check schedules.
The United States thus defaulted because Treasury’s back office was on the fritz in the wake of a debt limit showdown.
This default was temporary. Treasury did pay these T-bills after a short delay. But it balked at paying additional interest to cover the period of delay. According to Zivney and Marcus, it required both legal arm twisting and new legislation before Treasury made all investors whole for that additional interest.
Many consider Nixon’s decision to refusal to redeem dollars for gold to constitute a partial default.  For example, University of Massachusetts at Amherst economics professor Gerald Epstein notes:
Forty years ago this month, on August 15, 1971, President Nixon “closed the gold window”, refusing to let foreign central banks redeem their dollars for gold, facilitating  the devaluation of the U.S dollar which had been fixed relative to gold for almost thirty years. While not strictly a default on a US debt obligation, by closing the gold window the US government abrogated a financial commitment it had made to the rest of the world  at the Bretton Woods Conference in 1944  that set up the post-war monetary system. At Bretton Woods, the United States had promised to redeem any and all U.S. dollars held by foreigners – later limited to just foreign central banks — for $35 dollars an ounce. This promise explains why the Bretton Woods monetary system was called a “gold exchange standard” and why many believed the US dollar to be “as good as gold”.  When Nixon refused to let foreign central banks turn in their dollars for gold, and encouraged the devaluation of the dollar which reduced the value of foreign central bank holdings of dollars, the Nixon administration effectively “defaulted” on the United States’ long-standing obligations ending once and for all the Bretton Woods System.
 More at >  http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2013/10/the-myth-that-u-s-has-never-defaulted-on-its-debt/




at

A Trip Down Donald Trump's Bankruptcy Memory Lane

Hey Donald, how are you? It simply wouldn't be fair if I left you out now would it? I somewhat like you, you're a special kind of stupid.
By Jon Berke
Not a moment goes by in the current political news cycle that doesn’t include a headline or punchline about presidential hopeful Donald Trump. For the sake of historical accuracy, a recent look through the Debtwire news archives should help clarify some common misconceptions about the real estate mogul’s history in bankruptcy court.
Trump was grilled on August 6 at the first GOP presidential debate for the 2016 season about the most recent Chapter 11 filing of a corporation sporting the Trump moniker.  Fox News anchor Chris Wallace alleged Trump has “cost hundreds of jobs and deprived lenders of a $1 billion.”
In true Trump fashion, the tycoon threw out zingers like “lenders were killers,” Wallace was “living in a dream world,” and pointed out that he never declared personal bankruptcy.

The truth of the matter can be found somewhere in the middle. Long before Trump was known as a reality television star or a wannabe politician, his name was most recognizable as the larger-than-life owner of a casino-hotel empire. Trouble set in decades ago as each of the Atlantic City-based entities under Trump’s umbrella went through separate bankruptcies– the Trump Taj Mahal in 1991 and the Trump Plaza in 1992 –before reorganizing into Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts in 1995.
Trump Hotel & Casino Resorts kept the debt of its three New Jersey properties (including the Trump Marina, now known as the Golden Nugget) in separate silos and was eventually forced to use multiple private placements to refinance $1.9 billion in total debt. That burden led to another bankruptcy in 2004– the first as a collective company –and another renaming, to Trump Entertainment.

Fast-forward to 2009 when the global recession triggered Trump’s fourth trip through Chapter 11. This time the process resulted in Trump himself stepping away from the properties as his lenders, led by Carl Icahn, took over. Even the billionaire activist investor couldn’t save the ship, however, and Trump Entertainment filed for bankruptcy again last year. This time The Donald was only a belligerent bystander.
Mr. Trump sued his former company to clear up confusion over the “real” Trump properties, seeking to remove his name from the crumbling Trump Taj Mahal and Trump Plaza because the latest bankruptcy allegedly damaged his brand. A bankruptcy judge held off the suit, but the ultimate restructuring plan left Icahnwith only the Trump Taj Mahal – the Trump Marina was sold to the Golden Nugget, while Trump Plaza shut down in September 2014 after it was unable to find any buyers – and cut the company’s debt load from $285 million to $82 million.

Follow the links > http://tinyurl.com/qxe9xyv
at

"Going Green", with a twist.

 No one loves nature and balance more than myself yet some very important information was gathered in the 3 days following 9/11.
With all air flight grounded and a reduction in greenhouse gases, some calculated that the earth cooled by 2 degrees.
 Going green is great yet how fast do we wish to get there?


NARRATOR (JACK FORTUNE): This is a film that demands action. It reveals that we may have grossly underestimated the speed at which our climate is changing. At its heart is a deadly new phenomenon. One that until very recently scientists refused to believe even existed. But it may already have led to the starvation of millions. Tonight Horizon examines for the first time the power of what scientists are calling Global Dimming.
NARRATOR: September 12th 2001, the aftermath of tragedy. While America mourned, the weather all over the country was unusually fine. Eight hundred miles west of New York, in Madison, Wisconsin a climate scientist called David Travis was on his way to work.
DR DAVID TRAVIS (University of Wisconsin, Whitewater): Around the twelfth, later on in the day, when I was driving to work, and I noticed how bright blue and clear the sky was. And at first I didn't think about it, then I realised the sky was unusually clear.
NARRATOR: For 15 years Travis had been researching an apparently obscure topic, whether the vapour trails left by aircraft were having a significant effect on the climate. In the aftermath of 9/11 the entire US fleet was grounded, and Travis finally had a chance to find out.
DR DAVID TRAVIS: It was certainly, you know, one of the tiny positives that may have come out of this, an opportunity to do research that hopefully will never happen again.
NARRATOR: Travis suspected the grounding might make a small but detectable change to the climate. But what he observed was both immediate and dramatic.
DR DAVID TRAVIS: We found that the change in temperature range during those three days was just over one degrees C. And you have to realise that from a layman's perspective that doesn't sound like much, but from a climate perspective that is huge.



Ok so that's old news, let's add some other old news to twist your head around.

The Military's Pandora's Box 

by Dr. Nick Begich and Jeane Manning

This article was prepared to provide a summary of the contents of a book written in 1995 which describes an entirely new class of weapons. The weapons and their effects are described in the following pages. The United States Navy and Air Force have joined with the University of Alaska, Fairbanks, to build a prototype for a ground based "Star Wars" weapon system located in the remote bush country of Alaska.

The individuals who are demanding answers about HAARP are scattered around the planet. As well as bush dwellers in Alaska, they include: a physician in Finland; a scientist in Holland; an anti-nuclear protester in Australia; independent physicists in the United States; a grandmother in Canada, and countless others.

Unlike the protests of the 1960s the objections to HAARP have been registered using the tools of the 1990s. From the Internet, fax machines, syndicated talk radio and a number of alternative print mediums the word is getting out and people are waking up to this new intrusion by an over zealous United States government.

The research team put together to gather the materials which eventually found their way into the book never held a formal meeting, never formed a formal organization. Each person acted like a node on a planetary info-spirit-net with one goal held by all -- to keep this controversial new science in the public eye. The result of the team's effort was a book which describes the science and the political ramifications of this technology.

That book, Angels Don't Play this HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology, has 230 pages. This article will only give the highlights. Despite the amount of research (350 footnoted sources), at its heart it is a story about ordinary people who took on an extraordinary challenge in bringing their research forward. 



HAARP Boils the Upper Atmosphere

HAARP will zap the upper atmosphere with a focused and steerable electromagnetic beam. It is an advanced model of an "ionospheric heater." (The ionosphere is the electrically-charged sphere surrounding Earth's upper atmosphere. It ranges between 40 to 60 miles above the surface of the Earth.)

Read more > http://www.haarp.net/




Remember Haiti?








No, it’s not an alien colony, a time machine, or even a Russian version of America’s ionospheric HAARP program. But in a forest near Moscow, this Soviet-era “lightning machine” has a capacity arguably equal to Russia’s entire electricity output.
Tags, , , ,, 
Bloggers flock to see this technical marvel, which has been dubbed the “High Voltage Marx and Tesla Generators Research Facility.” The testing range, a branch of the Russian Electrical Engineering Institute, is in the sleepy town of Istra, 40 kilometers west of Moscow.


I was taught that creating a resume over 2 pages would bore potential employers. This blog's analytics has proven that to be a lie. 
In the moments to come, once situated, I'm going to "tell" an employer, "I'm here to contract for you and if you don't want my services I'm going to contract for your competition".





at

Tuesday, December 1, 2015

Hillary's "released" emails.

I hope you have a Snickers.


at

Stop paying to communicate.

The powers that be have also allowed many ways to communicate worldwide for free. Some are encrypted but if you're not starting a war, who cares who may be listening?

at

High valued "How to".

THE HIDDEN POWER 

To realise fully how much of our present daily life consists in symbols is to find the answer to the old, old question, What is Truth? and in the degree in which we begin to recognise this we begin to approach Truth. The realisation of Truth consists in the ability to translate symbols, whether natural or conventional, into their equivalents; and the root of all the errors of mankind consists in the inability to do this, and in maintaining that the symbol has nothing behind it. The great duty incumbent on all who have attained to this knowledge is to impress upon their fellow men that there is an inner side to things, and that until this inner side is known, the things themselves are not known.


There is an inner and an outer side to everything; and the quality of the superficial mind which causes it to fail in the attainment of Truth is its willingness to rest content with the outside only. So long as this is the case it is impossible for a man to grasp the import of his own relation to the universal, and it is this relation which constitutes all that is signified by the word "Truth." So long as a man fixes his attention only on the superficial it is impossible for him to make any progress in knowledge. He is denying that principle of "Growth" which is the root of all life, whether spiritual intellectual, or material, for he does not stop to reflect that all which he sees as the outer side of things can result only from some germinal principle hidden deep in the centre of their being.
Expansion from the centre by growth according to a necessary order of sequence, this is the Law of Life of which the whole universe is the outcome, alike in the one great solidarity of cosmic being, as in the separate individualities of its minutest organisms. This great principle is the key to the whole riddle of Life, upon whatever plane we contemplate it; and without this key the door from the outer to the inner side of things can never be opened. It is therefore the duty of all to whom this door has, at least in some measure, been opened, to endeavour to acquaint others with the fact that there is an inner side to things, and that life becomes truer and fuller in proportion as we penetrate to it and make our estimates of all things according to what becomes visible from this interior point of view.

Thank you T. T.

I come prepared.



This should have been the very first tech tip.


at

A quick note.

 Let me take a moment to clarify some facts and make some statements for the record.

  I firmly believe in God yet I do not believe in following another's directives or path.
Destiney is not a place where we arrive at, it's a place we create along our journey.

  God created us Perfect as we are. We have to modify that gift of perfection to become prosperous and adjusted within our society.

  "Society" is the fool's role model.

  I don't forgive nor forget. Why?

  Whether it be the mother nursing child, the mechanic eating with dirty hands or dope dealer peddling his drugs, these are examples of "people being people".
 I was inappropriate in my judgement of their actions in the first place. To then have the audacity to stand on high ground and say, "I forgive"? That's a level of arrogance not becoming of myself. Even if you stole from me, you're just people being people. I have to look at myself and assess who I Interact with.

  I went to a Lutheran grade school, Catholic high school and was baptised Methodist. "According to them", all good standing righteous Christians.
I wouldn't want to spend 15,  no 5, minutes with most of them and an eternity would be my hell.
And add to that, "My heaven or hell is right now, not some mysterious place off in Laalaa Land waiting for my flesh to die".

  In my simple belief system I employ indifference in the generic and using wisdom while endeavoring in the specific.
 I'll bet my sweet petunia God does not judge us as harshly as we judge others.
This world was working very well before I arrived with all my emotions and learned indoctrinated values.
 It was doing even better before man arrived with his / her......oh well, you get my point.

 "I know nothing and understand even less". I have been limited by my senses and the perceptions that are interpreted by my mind.
People that say they "know" something simply conjure up images in my mind of them jumping their wall of perception and seeing things and the world as only God Himself can see.

  As Jesus said, "I came to tell you that ye are gods and I Am the Son of God". If you have failed to see your true position within Universal Divinity, whose problem is that?

  There is the feed, the herd, the herders, kings and the gods. You can't turn a donkey into a race horse yet you can respect it for what it is. 

 God was the Original Cause of all things. Now the torch has been handed and I Am "my" cause, my life being the effects.

 * I will never impede another's path within their journey to whatever where ever. 
You will never impede my path.
 Until an individual can fully interpret "Spiritual tenacity" and the physical manifestation thereof... I'll leave it at that.


I'm just people being people, that's what people do.
Peace





*I'll risk the loss of associates and customers before losing my dignity anyday.
at
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Featured Posts

Beautiful American Bully Pups for Sale

 

Popular Posts