Monday, January 18, 2016

Richest 62 people as wealthy as half of world's population, says Oxfam

Charity says only higher wages, crackdown on tax dodging and higher investment in public services can stop divide widening.

The vast and growing gap between rich and poor has been laid bare in a new Oxfam report showing that the 62 richest billionaires own as much wealth as the poorer half of the world’s population.
Oxfam said that the wealth of the poorest 50% dropped by 41% between 2010 and 2015, despite an increase in the global population of 400m. In the same period, the wealth of the richest 62 people increased by $500bn (£350bn) to $1.76tn.


The charity said that, in 2010, the 388 richest people owned the same wealth as the poorest 50%. This dropped to 80 in 2014 before falling again in 2015.

Mark Goldring, the Oxfam GB chief executive, said: “It is simply unacceptable that the poorest half of the world population owns no more than a small group of the global super-rich – so few, you could fit them all on a single coach.
“World leaders’ concern about the escalating inequality crisis has so far not translated into concrete action to ensure that those at the bottom get their fair share of economic growth. In a world where one in nine people go to bed hungry every night, we cannot afford to carry on giving the richest an ever bigger slice of the cake.”
Leading figures from Pope Francis to Christine Lagarde, the managing director of the International Monetary Fund, have called for action to reverse the trend in inequality, but Oxfam said words had not been translated into action. Its prediction that the richest 1% would own the same wealth as the poorest 50% by 2016 had come true a year earlier than expected.
The World Economic Forum in Davos comes amid fears that the turmoil in financial markets since the turn of the year may herald the start of a new phase to the global crisis that began eight years ago – this time originating in the less-developed emerging countries.
Oxfam said a three-pronged approach was needed: a crackdown on tax dodging; higher investment in public services; and higher wages for the low paid. It said a priority should be to close down tax havens, increasingly used by rich individuals and companies to avoid paying tax and which had deprived governments of the resources needed to tackle poverty and inequality.
Three years ago, David Cameron told the WEF that the UK would spearhead a global effort to end aggressive tax avoidance in the UK and in poor countries, but Oxfam said promised measures to increase transparency in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies, such as the Cayman Islands and British Virgin Islands, had not been implemented.
Goldring said: “We need to end the era of tax havens which has allowed rich individuals and multinational companies to avoid their responsibilities to society by hiding ever increasing amounts of money offshore.
“Tackling the veil of secrecy surrounding the UK’s network of tax havens would be a big step towards ending extreme inequality. Three years after he made his promise to make tax dodgers ‘wake up and smell the coffee’, it is time for David Cameron to deliver.”
Oxfam cited estimates that rich individuals have placed a total of $7.6tn in offshore accounts, adding that if tax were paid on the income that this wealth generates, an extra $190bn would be available to governments every year.
The charity said as much as 30% of all African financial wealth was thought to be held offshore. The estimated loss of $14bn in tax revenues would be enough to pay for healthcare for mothers and children that could save 4 million children’s lives a year and employ enough teachers to get every African child into school.
Oxfam said it intended to challenge the executives of multi-national corporations in Davos on their tax policies. It said nine out of 10 WEF corporate partners had a presence in at least one tax haven and it was estimated that tax dodging by multinational corporations costs developing countries at least $100bn every year. Corporate investment in tax havens almost quadrupled between 2000 and 2014.
The Equality Trust, which campaigns against inequality in the UK, said Britain’s 100 richest families had increased their wealth by at least £57bn since 2010, a period in which average incomes declined.
Duncan Exley, the trust’s director, said: “Inequality, both globally but also in the UK, is now at staggering levels. We know that such a vast gap between the richest and the rest of us is bad for our economy and society. We now need our politicians to wake up and address this dangerous concentration of wealth and power in the hands of so few.”


Practice stock trading for free, "Kapitall".

 
Learn & trade for free.



Q&A: Everything You Need to Know About the National Debt

How big is the debt?
Currently, the national debt held by the public is over $13 trillion, which is around 74 percent of the country’s economy, as measured by Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The gross debt, which includes money owed to other parts of the federal government, is over $18 trillion, or roughly 102 percent of GDP.
Throughout history, the United States has normally maintained some amount of debt. However, with the exception of a brief period during and immediately after World War II, debt levels have never been as high as they are now. Without congressional action, debt levels will continue increasing.

Why do we have a national debt?
Particularly over the last 40 years, the federal government has generally spent more than it collected in revenue. When this occurs, the government must borrow money to cover the difference. The government borrows by selling securities such as Treasury bonds, then agreeing to pay bondholders back with interest. Over time, this borrowing accumulates into the national debt.
What are the effects of a high national debt?
The effects of the national debt on the economy are far from abstract. High levels of federal debt will cause:
  • Higher costs of living: Large amounts of debt mean higher interest rates on everything from credit cards to mortgage loans.
  • Slower wage growth: In normal economic times, every dollar an investor spends buying government debt is a dollar not invested elsewhere in the economy. That is, high debt “crowds out” more productive investments, leading to slower economic growth and lower wages.
  • Generational inequality: By not making responsible debt choices, we are placing higher debt burdens on our children and threatening their standard of living and retirement.
  • Reduced fiscal flexibility: Our debt levels doubled between 2008 and 2013 from 35 percent of GDP to over 70 percent, a result of and in response to the Great Recession. We can’t afford another recession. With an already high debt, the government has less room to respond to future crises such as international events or economic downturns.
  • Fiscal crises: Unchecked debt growth could eventually lead to a fiscal crisis, as recently occurred across Europe. At that point, investors in U.S. debt will demand higher returns, driving up interest payments, and leading to a debt situation spiraling out of control.

How can we bring our debt levels down?
Achieving meaningful debt reduction will require a comprehensive plan that addresses the major drivers of our debt. Reforming the tax code, slowing the growth of entitlement spending and reducing other spending, and helping to grow the economy are all necessary to put debt on a downward path over the long term.

Why act sooner rather than later?
Acting now to address our growing debt has numerous advantages. The sooner we act, the easier it will be to make changes. If we act now, changes can be phased in gradually so they are less disruptive. Because of compound interest, acting sooner means we can reduce debt to a sustainable level with a smaller amount of savings. For example, if we start now, we would need spending cuts and/or tax increases equaling 2.6 percent of the economy to bring the debt gradually down to historical levels in the next 25 years. Waiting 5 years, however, would require adjustments of 3.2 percent of GDP and waiting 10 years would require 4.2 percent. Waiting has real costs.
The sooner we act, the sooner we will receive the dividends of debt reduction such as faster economic growth, faster wage growth, and increased fiscal flexibility to address priorities. A smart mix of deficit reduction can also lower income inequality.

How much do we pay in interest?
Interest on the debt is now and is projected to continue being the fastest growing area of federal spending in the coming years, outpacing even Medicare or Social Security. In 2015, the U.S. spent $218 billion, or 6 percent of the federal budget, paying for interest on the debt.
In recent years, interest rates have been at historic lows. As they return closer to normal levels, the amount the government spends on interest will rise substantially. The Congressional Budget Office projects the interest rate on ten-year Treasury bonds will climb from slightly over 2 percent today to 4.2 percent by 2020. As a result, interest payments will double to more than $500 billion. By 2030, interest will represent over 14 percent of the federal budget and continue to climb. This represents money that cannot be spent on other government priorities such as education, national defense, research or infrastructure.
If interest rates rise even higher, our payments will be even greater—a one percentage point increase costs the country an additional staggering $1.7 trillion over a decade. If interest rates returned to the record-high levels of the 1980s, the country would roughly $6 trillion more in interest.

To whom do we owe the national debt?
While a majority of U.S. debt is held domestically, a sizable and growing portion is held by foreign investors. Both foreign governments and foreign citizens purchase U.S. debt.

Join Fix the Debt

Join Fix the Debt and demand a common sense solution to renew America's economic strength.

LEARN MORE



Get Informed

Get the facts about the debt situation and how it affects you. Dispel common myths and get answers to basic questions about the national debt.[Learn More]


 

Sunday, January 17, 2016

Top 10 Fastest Motorcycles in the World


Speeding with a prestige motorcycle is one of the popular hobbies for the wealth. They’re proud to ride a fastest motorcycle and go anywhere with it. Usually the fastest motorcycle in the world has the same synonym as the most expensive motorcycle in the world. Maybe you want to own one and feel the rise of your adrenaline when you’re on high speed in a motorcycle. Let’s take a look at those fastest motorcycle and see how fast they can run
10. Ducati 1098s: 169 mph (271 km/h)
This fast motorcycle was an innovation of Ducati from Italy. It’s using L-Twin Cylinder Engine with 4 valver for each cylinder with Desmodromic and liquid cooled. The top speed that can be reached by this motorcycle is 169 mph (271 km/h) while the power of this Ducati can reach 119.3 kW (160.0 bhp) @ 9750 rpm. This Ducati 1098s is using 6 speed chain transmissions.
fastest motorcycle Ducati 1098s
9. BMW K 1200 S: 174 mph (278 km/h)
This cool motorcycle is manufactured by BMW. It’s using 16 valves with 4 cylinder. The engine is DOHC, horizontal in-line and liquid cooled. The top speed that can be reached by this motorcycle is 174 mph (278 km/h). You can expect this motorcycle to produce 164.94 horsepower (120.4 kW) @ 10250 RPM. The transmission used by this fast motorcycle is 6 speed manual transmission.
fastest motorcycle BMW K 1200 S
8. Aprilia RSV 1000R Mille: 175 mph (278 km/h)
This fast motorcycle is coming from the factory of Aprilia. It’s using 998 cc 60 degree V-twin engine. You can expect this motorcycle to reach 175 mph (278 km/h) for its top speed. This motorcycle can produce 105.24 Kw (143.09 PS; 141.13 hp) @ 1000 rpm. This Aprilia motorcycle is using 6 speed chain drive transmission system.
fastest motorcycle Aprilia RSV 1000R Mille
7. Kawasaki Ninja ZX-11/ZZ-R1100: 176 mph (283 km/h)
This stylish motorcycle is manufactured by Japan based company, Kawasaki. It’s using 1052 cc 4-strokes, 4 cylinder, DOHC, liquid-cooled engine. You can reach 176 mph (283 km/h) if you accelerate this motorcycle. The power produced by this motorcycle is 108 kW (147 PS) @ 10,500 rpm. This motorcycle is using 6 speed transmission as some of other fastest motorcycle.
fastest motorcycle Kawasaki ZZR 1100
6. MV Agusta F4 1000 R: 176 mph (299 km/h)
This motorcycle is manufactured by Augusta of Italy. The motorcycle is powered by 4 cylinder, 16 radial valves, DOHC, liquid cooled engine. Top Speed ever reach by this motorcycle is 176 mph (299 km/h). The power output that can be produced by this motorcycle is 128 kw (174 horsepower). The transmission system used by this motorcycle is multi-disc wet clutch on 6 speed cassette gearbox.
fastest motorcycle MV Agusta F4 1000R
5. Yamaha YZF R1: 186 mph (297 km/h)
This motorcycle is produced by renowned Japan’s motorcycle manufacturer, Yamaha. The engine used for this motorcycle is forward inclined Parallel 4-cylinder, 20 valves, DOHC, liquid-cooled. This motorcycle can be expected to reach 186 mph (297 km/h) on its top speed. This motorcycle can produce 128.2 horsepower (95.6 Kw) at 10000 rpm. It’s using constant mesh 6 speed transmission system.
fastest motorcycle Yamaha YZF R1
4. Honda CBR1100XX Blackbird: 190 mph (310 km/h)
This motorcycle was released by Japan leading motorcycle manufacturer, Honda. This motorcycle is using 1137 cc, liquid-cooled, four cylinder engine. The engine can make this motorcycle reach 190 mph (310 km/h) while it’s running on top speed. This motorcycle can produce 114 kw (153 hp) @ 10,000 rpm power. The transmission system used by this motorcycle is close-ratio 6-speed transmission.
fastest motorcycle Honda CBR 1100 XX
3. MTT Turbine Superbike Y2K: 227 mph (365 km/h)
This superbike is running using Royl Royce 250-C20 turbo shaft engine. The top speed can be reached by this motorcycle is 227 mph (365 km/h) while it can produce 320 horsepower (239 Kw) @ 52,000 rpm. The transmission system used by this motorcycle is different than other motorcycle by simply using 2 speed automatic transmission.
fastest motorcycle MTT Turbine Superbike Y2K
2. Suzuki Hayabusa: 248 mph (397 km/h)
This Japanese origin motorcycle is using 1340 cc, 4 stroke, four cylinder, liquid-cooled, DOHC, 16 valve engine. This Suzuki manufactured motorcycle can reach 248 mph (392 km/h) on its top speed. The power can be produced is 197 horsepower (147 kw) @ 6750 rpm. Transmission system used is 6 speeds with constant mesh.
fastest motorcycle Suzuki Hayabusa
1. Dodge Tomahawk: 350 mph (560 km/h)
This Dodge Tomahawk is very limited motorcycle that use 10 cylinder, 90 degrees v-type engine. It can reach 350 mph (560 km/h) when it’s on top speed. This motorcycle can produce 500 horsepower (370 Kw) @ 5600 rpm. This motorcycle is using a simple transmission system by using just 2 speed manual transmission.
fastest motorcycle Dodge Tomahawk




Saturday, January 16, 2016

Friday, January 15, 2016

5 Apps To Spy On Your Kids Without Them Knowing

HUFF/POST 50
The best way to know where your teenagers are is to have the kind of relationship with them in which they tell you -- truthfully. But for those whose relationships are a bit strained, well, there's an app for that. Here is a list of some apps that will help protect your cover as you track your teens' online comings and goings:
1. mSpy
mSpy is the top used cell phone tracking app worldwide, according toTopTrackingApps. Its main selling point is that you can monitor multiple things with it -- who they call, what they text, which apps they use, the number of contacts, GPS location, etc. And according to SpyParent's founder Sedgrid Lewis, "it works." While the field of spying apps isn't limited, simplicity of use and reliability are factors to be considered. The average American teen spends up to seven hours a day in contact with others on electronic devices, and a recent survey by online security firm AVG found that by the time they are 16, one in three  has regretted something they did online.
2. The Spy Bubble
The Spy Bubble is another jack-of-all-spying-trades, also suitable for monitoring the phone of your suspected cheating spouse. Its site does offer some cautionary, if frightening, state-of-the-world information you might find useful. We are still reeling from this one about online photos and Photoshop: "Never let your kids share their photos online on an open forum. Why? They will ask. Everyone does that. Yes, everyone does that and about eight percent of those experience harassment due to photoshop effects on their photos. The worst bullying of this sort is seen by the girls, especially because female reputation is one of the most fragile things in the world."
 3. The Phone Sheriff
One nice feature of the Phone Sheriff  is that it allows you to set time limits on your teen's device. Want "OK, you can play with your phone for an hour" to really mean just 60 minutes? This app will shut down and lock the phone when you tell it to.
4. Mobicip
Mobicip isn't so much a tracker app as one that restores a bit of control over your teen's online life. The middle school level blocks online shopping, gambling, dating, liquor, and chat sites. The high school level blocks content that is adult, sexual, or involves weapons and violence. Good luck with your kid not using a friend's phone.
5. MamaBear
For parents of new drivers and parents of teens with friends who have had their licenses for 20 minutes, MamaBear will let you know the speed of the vehicle your teen is traveling in. Just don't text them to slow down, OK?

YOU MAY LIKE

CONVERSATIONS


Eric Marshall
maybe no singular group's right to privacy is violated more often and with less forethought than the young.

think of the millions of images and videos that are on facebook and instagram alone of children ages 1-12 right now, children who did not consent to having their image made public.

then products like this - it's disgusting the way people use their own inability to accept uncertainty in life as an excuse to violate the rights of their children. no, you should not always be with them. yes, that means something terrible could happen in your absence. that's the job you signed up for. if you don't like the terms now that your kid has agency and a little experience, too bad. it's not your kid's problem to deal with - it's yours.
Like · Reply · 127 · Jul 29, 2015 5:40pm
Spencer Pisinski · 
Let's condition people to thinking that spying on your friends and family is OK! Because that's how the police state works.
Like · Reply · 114 · Jul 30, 2015 3:55am
Julia McCall Nachtegaal
the usa is already a police state .
Like · Reply · 3 · Jul 30, 2015 4:50am
Spencer Pisinski · 
I'm aware
Like · Reply · Jul 30, 2015 4:52am
Lynn Spratley · 
Funny the police state you complain of you are not subject to lls
Like · Reply · Jul 30, 2015 6:40am
Laura Cockerill · 
Apps like this are the reason your kids are sneaking behind your back. Kids don't deserve to be spied on when they're not doing anything wrong. Can you say "trust issues"? What on earth did kids in the 90s do without their mother knowing their every move?! Take a chill pill
Like · Reply · 90 · Jul 30, 2015 3:50amEdited
Jennifer Mead
Oh, we did a lot. But the thing is, that's part of growing up.
Like · Reply · 5 · Jul 30, 2015 4:28am
Lacey Eder · 
I'm so glad I had a great relationship with my mom. If I left, she'd want to know where I was going, who I'd be with, and when I'd be back. And I had a cell phone in 8th grade so she could call if need be. You have to give the kids a little slack to be able to show you that they're worthy of your trust and can be allowed some damn privacy.
Like · Reply · 1 · Jul 30, 2015 6:11am
Sabrina Miller
Kids in the 80s & 90s didn't have smartphones & social media. I don't advocate spying... I advocate parents saying no to some of the technology.
Like · Reply · 8 · Jul 30, 2015 7:32am
Christopher J Cotta · 
Big Mother is watching you.
Like · Reply · 47 · Jul 29, 2015 8:01pm
Greensboro Police Public Abuse
Parents who use these apps are 80% more likely to die alone and unvisited in a nursing home says anyone with any comon sense. They are only conditioning their kids to accept NSA style spying in the future. Teens should check their phones and give any "parent" that uses them all holy hell.
Like · Reply · 385 · Jul 29, 2015 2:38pm
James Scott · 
Don't worry, teens don't need a logical reason to give their parents holy hell, that's just the natural way of things.
Like · Reply · 22 · Jul 29, 2015 3:17pm
Courtney Lynn
My kid, my house, my rules.
Like · Reply · 51 · Jul 30, 2015 3:36am
Linda Fernandez · 
Like Courtney said, My kid, my house, my rules!! But it sounds like you either have something to hide, or are just psychotically paranoid Greensboro!!
Like · Reply · 15 · Jul 30, 2015 3:39am
Katie Maverick Parker · 
Parenting. You're doing it wrong.
Like · Reply · 339 · Jul 29, 2015 4:04pm
Sami Nichols · 
What i don't get... If they have such trust issues and feel the need to spy, why do they let their kids have cell phones???
Like · Reply · 11 · Jul 30, 2015 2:05pm
Robert Myers · 
I agree Katie !
Like · Reply · Jul 30, 2015 2:36pm
Heather Marie Applegate
Well I would assume they let their kids have cell phones because they want to be able to contact their kids vice versa at any given time.
Like · Reply · Jul 31, 2015 3:14am
Maureen Soricelli
The rights of young people in this nation are consistently and conveniently ignored by parents, teachers, police officers, and judges. They don't pay taxes, they don't vote, and they have no collective power to oppose this kind of invasion of privacy. If you don't trust your child to do what they are supposed to do, then the problem is with your parenting skills. Checking on someone's safety and well-being is one thing; monitoring their every move is wrong.


Featured Posts

Beautiful American Bully Pups for Sale

 

Popular Posts