Wednesday, July 19, 2017

Most smart TVs are tracking you — Vizio just got caught


Vizio got in trouble with the FTC this week and had to pay $2.2 million to settle charges around having monitored the viewing habits on more than 11 million TVs without consent over the course of two years.
The main problem was that Vizio TVs had tracking features turned on by default, instead of an opt-in setting like many other manufacturers use (and, as you’ll see, sometimes hide or trick you into accepting). Newer Vizio TVs that run the company’s SmartCast system have the tracking turned off by default.
It was a bad practice that people had been complaining about for years — a possible class action lawsuit was even filed in 2016 — but the situation is now a relatively good one for Vizio TV owners: the company is specifically prohibited from tracking your viewing habits without explicit permission.
For people who own other TVs and streaming boxes, it might still be a different story. Those devices are very likely still tracking your TV habits in one way or another, and they probably aren’t as clear about it as Vizio now has to be.
Here’s what you do and don’t need to worry about if you don’t want your TV tracking you.

WHAT HAS VIZIO BEEN TRACKING?

Vizio has been collecting some fairly personal data. The company’s TVs are able to track what you watch on a second-by-second basis, whether you’re watching cable, playing a Blu-ray, or streaming a movie, according to the FTC.
That data is then paired with demographic details on you. That includes “sex, age, income, marital status, household size, education, home ownership, and household value.” The information is then sold to analytics and ad companies and used to target advertisements to you. This is something Vizio has been excited about: the data service, branded Inscape, was a key piece of the company’s IPO pitch to investors before the company agreed to sell itself to LeEco last year.

OTHER SMART TVS (AND STREAMING BOXES) DO THE SAME THING

In 2015, The Wirecutter took a really thorough look at the privacy policies for popular TVs and streaming devices, and it found that most are tracking you in one way or another — and they don’t all offer an option to opt out. Though it’s now a little over a year since the article was published, most of the information still appears to be current; it’s worth checking out if you want specific details on your devices.

YOU CAN TURN OFF MOST SMART TV TRACKING

Here’s how for some of the top TV brands:
  • Samsung: Samsung has an opt-in tracking service, called SyncPlus, that may have been turned on when your TV was set up. CBS Newssays the option to disable it is located in the settings menu, hidden inside the “Terms & Policy” section.
  • LG: It sounds like LG’s newer, webOS-based TV sets don’t have tracking enabled. But older LG smart TVs have a service, called LivePlus, that may have gotten enabled when you set up the TV. To turn it off, go to Settings → Smart TV settings and then disable LivePlus.
  • Sony: Wirecutter says that Sony also tries to enable a tracking service during the TV’s setup. It can be disabled inside the TV’s Help menu, under “Privacy Settings.” Doing so may disable some built-in recommendation features that rely on view tracking.
There are a lot of smart TVs out there and a lot of different names for their tracking features. If you own another brand’s smart TV, you can usually check the company’s privacy policy online; if there’s a section about advertising or recommendations, chances are there’s a tracking feature built in.

THE SITUATION MIGHT GET BETTER

In its settlement with the FTC, Vizio agreed to begin making its tracking notices much clearer. Future notices have to:
  1. Be presented on their own — so they can’t be buried in “terms of service” pages
  2. “Prominently disclose” what’s being tracked, what’ll be shared with third parties, who those parties are, and why it’s being shared
  3. Require the consumer to specifically agree to opt in
  4. Provide instructions on how to later opt out
This isn’t a legal standard — this is just something Vizio is held to because it messed up. But if other companies are worried about getting in trouble with the FTC, they now have a set of guidelines they can follow to make sure they get along without any problems. If we’re lucky, more TV manufacturers will begin following these guidelines, since they ought to make tracking settings much clearer.
The Wirecutter points out that, at this point, the situation is better and more transparent for Vizio owners than for anything else:

Is Your Drinking Water Safe? Fluoride Turns Drinking Water Toxic

*At times you may keep more friends by saying nothing and telling them to do their own research which in most cases they won't. Don't carry the burden.


Did you know that fluoride, known by many as the substance which helps protect teeth from tooth decay, was one of the toxic chemicals evaluated for use in the production of the atomic bomb during World War II?
Fluoride is so dangerous that a family-sized tube of fluoridated toothpaste contains enough fluoride to kill a 25-pound child!
If this is the case, why is more than 60 percent of the United States’ drinking fluoridated water?

Fluoride – A Grand Tale of Deceit

Water is supposed to be life-giving and refreshing but fluoridation has turned it into a toxic beverage!
Fluoride is one of the toxic chemicals still at large in America. We have already stopped asbestos from lining our pipes, lowered the lead content of gasoline, and banned PCBs and DDT for over 50 years, water fluoridation has been recognized as a “safe” practice.
This free report will expose one of the greatest health deceptions in history, explaining:
  • How scientists and groups with ulterior motives and vested interests whitewashed fluoride’s image, turning a toxin into a “nutrient”
  • How fluoride destroys your health by damaging your brain, immune, and gastrointestinal systems and bone and skeletal structures through fluorosis and other diseases,
  • Why drinking water does not need to be fluoridated

Systematization

*Please do not attempt to take the substance of these posts all in one lump. The information will be in cyber space until Google ends hosting such blogs. I have walked away from this blog twice but would never delete it. Thanks


Reflexive Monitoring

Reflexive Monitoring is the appraisal work that people do to assess and understand the ways that a new set of practices affect them and others around them. Like all NPT constructs, it has four components:
4.1 Systematization: participants in any set of practices may seek to determine how effective and useful it is for them and for others, and this involves the work of collecting information in a variety of ways. The work of systematization may be highly formal - the Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial is a prime example of formal systematization. But it may also be very informal, the collection of anecdotal examples of problems in practice around a set of common themes by an unqualified care assistant is every bit as much an example of the systematization of information.
4.2 Communal appraisal: participants work together - sometimes in formal collaboratives, sometimes in informal groups to evaluate the worth of a set of practices. They may use many different means to do this drawing on a variety of experiential and systematized information. These events happen continuously in almost every setting where people interact around a piece of hardware or new way of organizing work and ask each other 'is it working?' How they put the answers to these questions and negotiate the difficulties that stem from conflicts about what sort of information counts, and how it counts for different groups, are central to the future of any set of practices. Acts of communal appraisal - like data analysis meetings in clinical trials, or quality circles in lean healthcare organizations - are common and may be highly formalized as well as casual and informal.
4.3 Individual appraisal:  Participants in a new set of practices also work experientially as individuals to appraise its effects on them and the contexts in which they are set. From this work stem actions through which individuals express their personal relationships to new technologies or complex interventions. For example, a nurse working in a falls prevention program will work to appraise not only the worth of the program, but also its impact on her other tasks. So, a falls program that complicates and adds to an already complicated and demanding workload may well be have a low value attributed to it in practice irrespective of its effects on falls within the hospital.
4.4 Reconfiguration: appraisal work by individuals or groups may lead to attempts to redefine procedures or modify practices - and even to change the shape of a new technology itself.  For example, a nurse leading a falls prevention program might look again at the ways in which risk of falling was calculated in practice and the demands that this risk placed on the delivery of nursing care elsewhere on the ward. If the work of calculating risk of falling was disproportionate to the work involved in dealing with other kinds of risks on the ward, then there would be pressure to modify the falls prevention program to make it workable in practice.

Why Sustainability Is Now the Key Driver of Innovation



Abstract
When companies pursue sustainability, it's usually to demonstrate that they are socially responsible. They expect that the endeavor will add to their costs, deliver no immediate financial benefits, and quite possibly erode their competitiveness. Meanwhile, policy makers and activists argue that it will take tougher regulations and educated, organized consumers to force businesses to adopt sustainable practices. But, say the authors, the quest for sustainability can unearth a mother lode of organizational and technological innovations that yield both top-line and bottom-line returns. That quest has already begun to transform the competitive landscape, as companies redesign products, technologies, processes, and business models. By equating sustainability with innovation today, enterprises can lay the groundwork that will put them in the lead when the recession ends. Nidumolu, Prahalad, and Rangaswami have found that companies on the journey to sustainability go through five distinct stages of change: (1) viewing compliance as opportunity; (2) making value chains sustainable; (3) designing sustainable products and services; (4) developing new business models; and (5) creating next-practice platforms. The authors outline the challenges that each stage entails and the capabilities needed to tackle them.
Do you want to read the rest of this article?
Request full-text

    • Therefore, the combination of sustainability and innovation is indispensable to realize new combinations, which can lead to an innovation process tackling the current sustainability challenges. Nidumolu et al. described sustainability as the relevant key driver for innovation in the 21st century[15]. The expressions for combining innovation and sustainability include sustainable innovation, sustainability-driven innovation and eco-innovation.
     Full-text · Article · Dec 2017
    • When a company is engaged in innovative and strategic socially responsible practices that encourage the development of products and services that benefit workers in the supply chain, fair trade, and transparency of ethical data, and help communities surrounding the supply chain, it may signal the legitimacy of the company and reinforce the social contract it has with society (Kozlowski et al. 2015). Implementing innovative supply chain sustainability practices can result in new products and the opening of new markets for the supply chain (Nidumolu et al. 2009;Pagell and Wu 2009). Design changes to reduce societal impact that are below regulatory requirements have no benefits for companies.
     Full-text · Article · Dec 2017
    • This section presents the results of the study and discusses them. First of all,Table 1Waas et al., 2012;Brandli et al., 2015;Leal Filho et al., 2015b) or on innovation at universities (Cameron, 1996;Clugston, 1999;Crossan and Apaydin, 2010;Dahle and Neumayer, 2001;Hart and Milstein, 2003;Paech, 2007;Hockerts and Morsing, 2008;Nidumolu et al., 2009;Barbieri and Silva, 2011;Hockerts and Morsing, 2008;Cars and West, 2015;European Commission, 2016;Ferreira and Dionísio, 2016), and do not have an integrated vision about innovation and SD. The evaluation of the importance of the barriers identified inTable 1points out the fifteen most significant barriers according to the results of the Likert scale (for each scale there was a weight correspondent, for example, the scale 5 expressed a greater degree of relevance in comparison to weight 1).Table 2shows the results of the statistical analysis andFig.
     Full-text · Article · Jul 2017
    • In fact,Griggs et al. (2013)propose a new paradigm for sustainable development in which the global economy is seen as nested within society, which itself lies within and is symbiotically dependent upon a healthy biophysical system. In the past, many business students have typically been disconnected from environmental education (Becker, 1997), but with declining natural resources, shifting climate conditions, deteriorating ecosystem services, and the consumer-driven push toward transparent supply chains, knowledge of ecological impact and sustainable initiatives has become a driver for business success (Nidumolu, Prahalad, & Rangaswami, 2009). The five SDGs that are closely linked to the Environmental Responsibility theme of SEERS are: water and sanitation (#6), affordable and clean energy (#7), climate action (#13), life below water (#14), and life on land (#15) (seeTable 1).
     Full-text · Article · Jul 2017 · Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review
    • Innovation was made a key to understanding the linkage between CSR and a company's social and financial performance (Visser, 2010). Nidumolu,Prahalad and Rangaswami (2009)pointed out conclusively that CSR is a fundamental driver of innovation. EuropeanCommission (2006)argued that CSR may contribute to sustainable development and simultaneously increase corporate competitive potential by stimulating innovation.
     Full-text · Article · Jul 2017
    • The uncertainty of green purchase is modeled in the fraction of consumers at each preference location x.malized to[0,1]. We want to assist the second mover (Company 1) to catch up with the environmental quality of the early mover (Company 2) (Nidumolu et al. 2009); thus, we are unwilling to deal with non-environmental-friendly products and pure price competition; therefore, we assume that θ 1 = θ 2 .Relaxing the uniform assumption in the consumer population is essential to our analysis. In classical spatial competition models, the number of consumers with all types of preferences was assumed to be constant along the linear city, which is an over-simplified assumption.
     Full-text · Article · Jul 2017
Show more
Article
September 2009
This chapter contains sections titled: Engineers and Social Responsibility: An Obligation to Do Good When Expert Advice Works, and When it Does Not Do We Need a Technology Policy? Task for Engineers - Resuscitating the U.S. Rail System
Article
September 1992 · Nature · Impact Factor: 41.46
Article
Abstract The stakeholder concept,has become,a central idea in understanding business/societ y relationships. There is an inherent acceptance that allbusinesses have stakeholders, and that managing,them,appropriately can help reduce,risk and,improve,all companies' social responsibility (European Commission and Observatory of European SMEs, 2002; Irwin, 2002). However, stakeholder research has... [Show full abstract]
Discover more

Featured Posts

Rental Properties for Sale, Santa Marianita, Ecuador

  Beautiful rental with beach access. Utilities and WiFi are included, just bring your food and move in. *Be sure to ask about our long-term...

Popular Posts