Tuesday, May 31, 2016

Top 5 Android security apps: Do they protect you?


*Apple users will have to find what works for them. I don't like Apple, don't think much of Apple and don't find the average Apple user that can explain all the bullshit on their devices.
 For the greater part, I find Apple users to be no more than status seekers.

The subject of security for the Android platform is far from straightforward. There’s some debate about whether you really need antivirus apps on your smartphone. Much depends on whether you sideload apps, but there’s no denying that malware has grown into a much greater concern since we first wrote this article back in 2012. Luckily, security apps have improved dramatically to keep pace with the new threats, so you have plenty of great protection to choose from.
The majority of Android security apps are actually packages that include a host of other tools from contact filtering to remote lock or wipe. We decided to take a look at the top five Android security apps and find out what they do. We are taking a look at these from a consumer point of view, so be warned that some of the “free” apps are only free for personal, non-commercial use.
Updated on 2-10-2016 by Simon Hill: Refreshed results to reflect latest AV-Test results, updated screenshots for Avira, edited other options, and fixed gallery.


Interactive
As a genuinely free app for the Android platform, Avast! Mobile Security is offering an impressive range of tools. It has antivirus protection, it scans your apps to provide details on what they are doing, and it has a shield that scans URLs for malware.
There are various additional tools in the package and the best of the bunch is the anti-theft component. The app is actually based on an old app called Theft Aware which Avast acquired. The anti-theft feature is hidden and allows you to remote control your smartphone using SMS. So if you lose your phone, you can remotely lock it, locate it, or wipe it. You can make it play a siren sound, lock down the SIM card, and prevent USB debugging as well. It’s a comprehensive solution for theft protection.
If you have a rooted device then there’s also a firewall that allows you to control network traffic. You can block access to Wi-Fi or the network for specific apps which is handy for security and potentially saving on battery juice as well.
According to the latest of 25 popular Android security apps, Avast is a solid option with an overall detection rate of 98.1 percent. Although it is not top of the charts in terms of malware detection, the extra functionality (including the anti-theft tools and a firewall for rooted devices) still make it worth considering. It has a light footprint with no discernible drain on battery life and no impact on general performance. It also returned no false positives.
The fact this app is completely free, has a wide range of features, and offers protection for rooted devices, makes it a strong contender. If you’re looking for a security solution for your Android smartphone, and your primary concern is malware and safe browsing, then this could be the right app for you.
Avast Marketing Director, Milos Korenko, has assured us that “There might be a paid version in the future but that won’t have an impact on the free version. It will continue to be available and loaded with features.”
Get it on:

Eset deserves its place in our top five with a 100 percent detection rate in the latest AV-Test report and an easy-to-use interface. The basic app is completely free and it provides real-time scans of apps to detect malware and potentially dodgy apps trying to send texts or make premium rate calls.
The free version also includes a suite of anti-theft tools. You can remotely locate and lock your smartphone or tablet, and you can prevent anyone from uninstalling apps by using password protection.
If you want remote wipe or SIM guard capabilities then you have to spring for the premium version at $20 per year, but it also delivers anti-phishing protection, an app audit feature, device monitoring for unwarranted use of data, and advanced call blocking.
Get it on:
,
With a 99.9 percent detection rate and no false positives, you can trust the free version of Avira to keep your Android smartphone or tablet safe. It has a light footprint in terms of performance and a sleek, minimalist design that fits in well with the Android platform.
Avira allows you to scan apps for potential trouble and it scans new apps or updates automatically. There’s also the usual batch of anti-theft tools, to help you find your device remotely, lock it, wipe it, or trigger an alarm.
There’s also an identity safeguard tool that can tell you whether your email account, or the email addresses of your friends, have been leaked or compromised. A decent range of blacklisting options rounds off this app, so you can block problem callers or nuisance spam.
There is a premium version that adds anti-phishing, more regular updates, and better support, but the free version covers enough bases for most people.
Get it on:

Some of you are probably just looking for malware protection that’s as barebones as possible. If you don’t want anti-theft tools, or identity protection, or any of the other possibly superfluous features that come in many security apps then AVL will suit you.
This app scored a 99.8 percent detection rate with one false positive and AV-Test found performance was good with no undue impact on speed or battery life. AVL can scan a variety of file formats beyond APKs and it’s designed to be fast and efficient. It does also offer call blocking capabilities.
Get it on:
The last time we checked 18 of the 31 apps tested by AV-Test in March 2014 scored 100 percent detection rates, a feat that only  between July and December 2015 managed. If you don’t fancy any of our picks then  and  offer free versions that are worth a look. Both scored a 100 percent detection rate and could easily have made the list.
From the big name security software brands,  and  will attract many people because they are familiar names, but compared to some of the free options there’s really nothing there to justify the price tags. Same goes for the excellent . Bitdefender and Norton did score 100 percent in November’s test, but they are only free trials and will bug you about paying out an annual subscription.
You can read about whether you actually  and run through some  in the next two parts of this security series. However, if you do want to go ahead and get an Android security app, is your best bet right now. It offers the functionality you’d expect from a premium app for free. If you’re not sure about 360 Mobile Security then we’d recommend .
If you’ve tried any of these apps out or you have another Android security app you feel is worthy of a mention then post a comment and let us know about it.
————
Updated on 2-10-2015 by Simon Hill: Updated 360 Security description and screenshots.
Updated on 2-5-2014: Added a companion video showcasing the apps listed below.
Updated on 5-08-2014 by Simon Hill: Added updated results, changed intro, updated app descriptions and final sections, and added ESET Mobile Security & Antivirus, Avira Antivirus Security, and AVL.
Updated on 11-20-2013 by Simon Hill: Added updated results, tweaked text, added 360 Mobile Security from Qihu, updated other apps section and recommendations.
Article originally published on 8-1-2012.


Read more: http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/top-android-security-apps/#ixzz4AHRQMnIz
Follow us: @digitaltrends on Twitter | digitaltrendsftw on Facebook

Goofin off with quad practice.


*In a semi autonomous defense system this drone would have to fly according to a programmed flight path(s) as well as being able to be overridden by human command.








*I have issues but I address them...LOL

Monday, May 30, 2016

Mobile phones the biggest target for hackers


Recent security breaches have heightened our awareness of cybersecurity issues. The Staples hack and other security breaches have resulted in unprecedented damages. However, the majority of mobile device users have yet to be sensitized to their personal and corporate security risks.
For example, a security study found that 69 percent of users store sensitive personal information on their mobile devices.  Examples include banking information, confidential work-related items and provocative videos and photos. In addition, 51 percent of mobile device consumers share usernames and passwords with family, friends and colleagues. This in spite of the fact that 80 percent of such devices are unprotected by security software.   
While mobile device security attacks are relatively small, they are the new frontier for hackers.  Listed below are highlights from several mobile device surveys:
  • The four top threats to mobile devices include: 1) lost and stolen phones; 2) insecure communications; 3) leveraging less-secure, third-party app stores; and 4) vulnerable development frameworks.
  • One in 10 U.S. smartphone owners are victims of phone theft.
  • Mobile malware attacks are increasing, with 2014 exhibiting a 75 percent increase in Android malware attacks on devices.
  • The use of mobile devices to access enterprise resources introduces significant security risks.
Cyberattackers are typically attempting to obtain access to sensitive or personal data, and then use it to access financial accounts. Some methodologies used include social engineering, distributing and executing malware, and accessing data through public Wi-Fi networks.
A recent survey found that phishing and scams for winning free stuff were the most popular SMS attacks. Unsolicited SMS messages attempted to trick users into providing detailed, sensitive information about their financial accounts at major banks. The mobile malware StealthGenie secretly monitors calls, texts and videos on mobile phones. Bitdefender has been able to break the secure communications between a Samsung watch and an Android device with ease, using brute force sniffing tools. (See “5 New Threats to Your Mobile Device Security” for more information.)
These are a sampling of the numerous cybercriminal methodologies for accessing user finances and data. Listed below are some user actions for reducing or minimizing a successful attack:
  • Always enable password or PIN protection on your device.
  • Run scans using a respected security and malware program on a regular basis (see the best antivirus software for Android devices).
  • Subscribe to managed mobile device services such as anti-malware and mobile device locator services; also lock the device and wipe all data in the event of device theft.
  • Encrypt mobile device data.
  • Install/run the latest versions of your device OS and all mobile apps.
  • Upgrade to the most recent firmware for your mobile device.
  • Do not access secure or highly sensitive information while using public Wi-Fi networks.
  • Avoid clicking on ads on your mobile devices.
  • Do not configure phones to allow the installation of apps from unknown sources, e.g., only download  from well-known and trusted app stores (although they are not foolproof).
  • Observe all corporate bring-your-own-device (BYOD) and related policies.
In addition, ISO lists some common sense advice regarding mobile devices, as included below:
  • Do not openly display a device — keep it in a pocket or handbag.
  • If possible, avoid using it in crowded areas.
  • Properly mark your phone with your ZIP code.
  • If the phone is lost or stolen, report it immediately to the police and to your service provider.
  • Be aware of your surroundings and the people near to you.
  • Do not leave it unattended – keep it with you at all times.
  • Make a note of your phone’s IMEI number.
  • Do not leave a device in view in an unattended vehicle.
This post was written as part of the Dell Insight Partners program, which provides news and analysis about the evolving world of tech. To learn more about tech news and analysis visit Tech Page One. Dell sponsored this article, but the opinions are our own and don’t necessarily represent Dell’s positions or strategies.

*I'd certainly like to see my coded notebook hacked.


Pros & Cons of Living in The Era of Technology

There is little doubt that we are currently living in the age of technology. With ever evolving technology at our fingertips is should come as no surprise that every facet of ours lives is now becoming dependent on increasingly complex devices. There is no question that such devices have enriched our lives making them infinitely easier, but all to often we overlook the negative aspects of living in such a digital world. Let’s take some time to weigh out the pros and cons of living in this era of technology.

The Pros of Living A Digital Life

The benefits of technology are all around us and can be seen in everything from electricity to global communications. Our cars and cell phones have navigation systems to ensure that we do not get lost. We can pay our bills at the touch of a button on the internet. Our cellphones have evolved into tiny little computers in our pockets.
We can now communicate with anyone, anywhere in the world at any time not only by telephone, but also by video conference, instant messenger and email. With faster internet connections being introduced on a daily basis it seems like the only limit to what technology can do is our own imagination. All of these innovations have one goal in mind – to make our lives easier!
Let’s look at a couple of examples. First, consider that you are the parent of a teenager. It’s 10pm and your 14-year-old daughter has missed her curfew by 30 minutes. What goes through your mind? Did she get kidnapped? Hit by a car? Attacked? The possibilities are terrifying.
However, thanks to technology she has her mobile phone and you can give her a call (because your teenager will not think to call you first!)  and establish that she is perfectly fine, but missed the bus home from the movies and had to wait for the next one. Some parents might then think, ‘wait, she could be lying! What if she is with that no good boy from a close by town?’
Thankfully, technology has your back and you can use the GPS tracker on the mobile phone monitoring app you installed on her phone and confirm that yes, she truly is at the bus stop by the movie theatre! You could even check her text messages to confirm that she really did go to the movie with Jill and not Jack!
Another scenario could be that you just left the office and are half way home when a colleague calls you in a panic because they need an urgent file from you. You would need to get off the subway and head back to the office, right? WRONG! Thanks to technology you can use your mobile device to log onto your cloud storage and email the file to the colleague and still make it home for dinner!

The Cons of Life in The Technology Era

It all sounds great, but there are still plenty of downsides. It seems like every other day the news is reporting cyber crimes as criminals begin to take advantage of our technology dependence. People have their credit card numbers stolen and businesses have their information hacked or computer systems disabled.
We are so dependant on technology that if for example, the bank’s computer network failed, it is likely that most day-to-day operations would grind to a halt! While global communications are a great innovation they are also a dangerous one as the internet affords everyone some degree of anonymity.
Let’s go back to the example where you are parenting a teenage girl. What if that cinema date was actually her meeting up with someone she got talking to online? Someone she thought was 14 years old like her, but in reality was a 50-year-old predator? Even although most parents try to teach kids about internet safety, teens believe that they are invincible and know best. ‘It will never happen to me’ is a phrase uttered by every teen at some point!
Thankfully, although technology created this dangerous situation, technology can also resolve it. If you have mobile phone spying software installed on her phone then you could have intercepted those plans to meet and put an end to it before anything bad had a chance to develop.
So is technology good or bad? The answer, quite simply is both! Technology is a great thing that makes our lives so much easier, but at the same time it must be treated with respect as it also has negative sides. It’s kind of like a hammer. You can use the hammer to build things or to harm others.
In theory, technology is neutral. At the end of the day it’s up to us to use it for good or evil.

Posted by Deepali

Deepali has been contributor to many magazines and blogs. She is a marketing consultant for mSpy. For more information, visit https://twitter.com/mSpycom



Black Unemployment Facts


The African-American Labor Force in the Recovery

While the unemployment rate for African Americans fell substantially in January to 13.6 percent, it remains significantly higher than the 8.5 percent rate of November 2007, just prior to the recession. Aggregate numbers show that the African-American community as a whole has exhibited poorer labor market outcomes than other races even prior to the recession and during the recovery, demonstrating that they often face different and greater challenges. By breaking down the data by age, gender, education, and other criteria, this report examines in greater detail the trends in employment and unemployment among African Americans and shows how they have been faring in the economic recovery. The "Looking Forward" section at the end of the report discusses the President's 2013 Budget and highlights various ways in which Department of Labor programs have helped to address the challenges faced by African Americans in the labor market.
Image result for obama administration pic

Blacks in the Labor Force at a Glance

African Americans made up 11.6 percent of the U.S. labor force — those employed or looking for work — in 2011.1 African Americans have comprised a gradually growing share of the U.S. labor force over time, rising from 10.9 percent in 1991. Overall, in 2011, 18 million Blacks were employed or looking for work, representing 61.4 percent of all African Americans, somewhat less than the 64.1 participation rate for all Americans.
In 2011, about half of Blacks aged 16 and older had a job, and 18.0 percent of those employed worked part-time.2 Blacks are the only racial or ethnic group for whom women represent a larger share of the employed than do men - more than half (53.8 percent) of employed Blacks in 2011 were women, compared to 46.0 percent among employed Whites. Nonetheless, employed black women still earn less than employed black men - black women earn roughly $0.91 to every dollar earned by black men. While the wage gap among Blacks is smaller than that for Whites, this is largely driven by the fact that African-American men face lower wages compared to men in other race groups in the economy. Black men employed full time earned on average $653 per week in 2011, 76.3 percent of the average salary earned by white men. By contrast, black women earn on average $595 per week or 84.6 percent of the average salary earned by white women.3 While the gap between black and white men fell substantially during the 1990s due to increased occupational desegregation, in the last few years the gap in earnings remained stable throughout the recent recession and recovery period.4
More than a quarter of employed black workers aged 25 or older have earned a college degree, a share that exceeds that for Hispanics5 but continues to trail that for Whites. While black workers continue to trail Whites in educational attainment, the number of African Americans with a college degree has been growing faster. In the past decade, the number of black workers with a college degree has increased by over a quarter, compared to a fifth among White workers.
Black workers are more likely to be employed in the public sector than are either their white or Hispanic counterparts. In 2011, nearly 20 percent of employed Blacks worked for state, local, or federal government compared to 14.2 percent of Whites and 10.4 percent of Hispanics. Blacks are less likely than Hispanics and nearly as likely as Whites to work in the private sector, not including the self-employed.6 Few Blacks are self-employed — only 3.8 percent reported being self-employed in 2011 — making them almost half as likely to be self-employed as Whites (7.2 percent).
The average unemployment rate for Blacks in 2011 was 15.8 percent, compared to 7.9 percent for Whites, and 11.5 percent for Hispanics. Historically, Blacks have had persistently higher unemployment rates than the other major racial and ethnic groups. In addition, the increase in the black unemployment rate during the recession was larger than that for other races partly because workers with less education are particularly hard hit during recessions. Moreover, the unemployment rate for Blacks was slower to fall after the official end of the recession. The slower recovery for African Americans in the labor market has been partly the result of government layoffs after the official end of the recession. Blacks have been more vulnerable to the drastic layoffs in government in the past two years because they make up a disproportionate share of public sector workers. Moreover, with the exception of health and education, Blacks are under-represented in the sectors that have experienced the greatest job growth during the recovery, including manufacturing and professional and business services.
In addition, once unemployed, Blacks are less likely to find jobs and tend to stay unemployed for longer periods of time. Blacks remained unemployed longer than Whites or Hispanics in 2011, with a median duration of unemployment of 27.0 weeks (compared to 19.7 for Whites and 18.5 for Hispanics). Nearly half (49.5 percent) of all unemployed Blacks were unemployed 27 weeks or longer in 2011, compared to 41.7 percent of unemployed Whites and 39.9 percent of unemployed Hispanics. Once a worker is unemployed for a prolonged period, it becomes harder to find a new job. Job search becomes harder for such an individual because the worker may not have the networks of employed friends and family to refer them to jobs and because they may become disconnected and depressed the longer they remain unemployed.7 Also, job search becomes more difficult without income support, as an unemployed person may not have the resources to afford transportation, seek information and even afford clothes for interviews.8 Finally, as the pool of applicants grows larger, employers sometimes use employment status, including unemployment duration, and credit ratings as ways to screen out candidates even if these are poor screens and these candidates may be qualified for the jobs.9
Recently there have been some encouraging signs for African Americans. The unemployment rate for Blacks has been trending down since summer 2011. In January 2012, the unemployment rate for Blacks was 13.6 percent; down 3.1 percentage points from the peak of 16.7 percent in August 2011.10 Continuing employment gains in private sector health care jobs since the end of the recession have helped to bring the unemployment rate down for Blacks, as this industry has a large share of African-American workers. Over the past year ending in January 2012, Blacks have seen strong job growth in a diverse range of industries, including financial activities, professional and business services, and education and health services. African Americans are also benefiting from the slowing pace of job losses in state and local government which have disproportionately affected them.

Periods of High Unemployment

In January 2007, the year the recession began, the unemployment rate for black workers was 7.9 percent, compared to 4.2 percent for Whites and 5.8 percent for Hispanics. By January 2009, the unemployment rates had climbed to 7.1 percent for Whites, 12.7 percent for Blacks and 10.0 percent for Hispanics. By the end of 2010, the unemployment rate for Blacks had risen more than for either Whites or Hispanics.
Unemployment for the nation peaked at 10 percent in October 2009, while the unemployment rate for Blacks continued to rise before peaking at 16.7 percent in August 2011 (Chart 1). In comparison, the unemployment rate for Whites peaked along with the national rate in October 2009 at 9.3 percent. Hispanic unemployment peaked at 13.1 percent in November 2010.

In recent months, there have been signs that African Americans have begun to benefit from the nation's economic recovery. The national unemployment rate in January 2012 was 8.3 percent, well below the nation's average unemployment rate in 2010 of 9.6 percent. Although their unemployment rate started to decline later, African Americans also saw improvement over that time. The black unemployment rate in January 2012 was 13.6 percent, down from the 2010 average of 16.0 percent, and a little lower than February 2009's rate of 13.7 percent.
Chart 2 shows the seasonally-adjusted monthly unemployment rate for black men, women, and youth (aged 16-19). As shown in the chart, the unemployment rate among adult black men (aged 20 and over) has risen considerably more than for adult black women (aged 20 and over), creating an unemployment rate gap that grew throughout the recession and only narrowed in January 2012. In 2007, the unemployment rate gap averaged 1.2 percentage points. By 2009, the average unemployment rate gap between adult black men and women had expanded to 4.8 percentage points, before narrowing slightly over the course of 2010 and 2011 to 3.5 percentage points. In January 2012, the gender unemployment gap was virtually eliminated. Adult black men had an unemployment rate of 12.7 percent compared to a rate of 12.6 percent among adult black women.


Across all races and ethnic groups, the unemployment rate for youth (aged 16-19) is much higher than that for adults. As Chart 2 illustrates, this is also true among Blacks. The unemployment rate for black youth reached a high of 49.1 percent in November 2009 and as of January 2012 had fallen to 38.5 percent. Not only has the unemployment rate remained high, but a large number of black teens are no longer in the labor force - either working or looking for work — which explains some of the drop in the unemployment rate. In 2007, black teens participated in the labor force at a rate of 30.3 percent. By 2011, that rate had declined to 24.9 percent. Labor force participation of black men and women aged 20-54 declined by 2.3 percentage points from 78.2 percent in 2007 to 75.9 percent in 2011, while participation among older black workers (aged 55 and older) increased by 1.3 percentage points — 35.3 percent in 2007 to 36.6 percent in 2011.
Some of this decline in labor force participation among black teens indeed reflects an increase in the proportion of black teens enrolled in school. Among 16-19 year-olds, 85.4 percent were enrolled in school in October 2011, compared to 80.7 percent in 2007, the year the recession began.11 The rate of school enrollment also increased for Blacks aged 20-24. In October 2011, 34.9 percent of this cohort was enrolled in school compared to 32.8 percent in October 2007.
One factor that may partially explain why black labor force outcomes lag behind those of their white counterparts is their lower educational attainment. However, as Chart 3 illustrates, the role of education in explaining the unemployment disparity faced by African Americans is very complicated. African-American unemployment rates are higher than those for Whites at every education level.
Despite racial difference in unemployment rates by education level, the link between greater educational attainment and improved employment outcomes remains strong for all racial and ethnic groups, including African Americans. Additionally, the unemployment gap between Blacks and Whites is smaller for those with more education. Unemployment rates for African Americans were lowest among those who attained a bachelor's degree or higher. For instance, Blacks with at least a bachelor's degree had an unemployment rate of 7.1 percent (compared to 3.9 percent for Whites) whereas Blacks with some college or an associate's degree had an unemployment rate of 13.1 percent (compared to 7.0 percent for Whites). Unemployment rates are higher for those with fewer years of schooling. Blacks with only a high school diploma had an unemployment rate of 15.5 percent (compared to 8.4 percent for Whites), and Blacks with less than a high school diploma experienced a 24.6 percent unemployment rate (compared to 12.7 percent for Whites with less than a high school diploma).






Hillary / Trump, Americathon revisited




It was all so funny when it started.

Remember, "The Crying Indian"?

Have the chickens come home to roost?

Will your children pay for the sins of their forefathers?

I would gather it's up to these individuals.

I do not forgive, I do not forget, I do not retreat, I do not surrender.

Featured Posts

Rental Properties for Sale, Santa Marianita, Ecuador

  Beautiful rental with beach access. Utilities and WiFi are included, just bring your food and move in. *Be sure to ask about our long-term...

Popular Posts